Review – recall, analysis and evaluation of a new artistic, scientific or popular science work; genre of criticism, literary, newspaper and magazine publication.
In the classics, the reviewer discovers, first of all, the possibility of its actual, cutting-edge reading. Any work should be considered in the context of modern life and the modern literary process: to evaluate it precisely as a new phenomenon. This topicality is an indispensable sign of the review.
Under essays-reviews essay writer understand such creative works:
a small literary-critical or journalistic article (often polemical in nature) in which the work in question is an occasion for discussing topical public or literary problems;
an essay that is largely a lyrical reflection of the author of the review, inspired by the reading of the work, rather than its interpretation;
An expanded annotation in which the content of a work, the features of a composition, is disclosed and at the same time its evaluation is contained.
An approximate plan for reviewing the literary work.
Bibliographic description of the work (author, title, publisher, year of release) and a brief (in one or two sentences) retelling its content. Immediate response to the work of literature (recall-impression).
Critical analysis or complex text analysis. Argumented evaluation of the work and personal reflections of the author of the review. In the review is not necessarily the presence of all of the above components, most importantly, that the review was interesting and competent.
Briefly about what you need to remember when writing a review: A detailed retelling reduces the value of the review: first, it is not interesting to read the work itself; secondly, one of the criteria for a weak review is rightly considered substitution of analysis and interpretation of the text by retelling it.
Every book begins with a title that you interpret as you read in the process of reading, you solve it. The name of a good work is always multivalued, it is a kind of symbol, a metaphor.
A lot to understand and interpret the text can give an analysis of the composition. Reflections on which compositional techniques (antithesis, ring structure, etc.) are used in the work will help the referee to penetrate the author’s intention. On which parts can you separate the text? How are they located?
It is important to assess the style, originality of the writer, to disassemble the images, the artistic techniques that he uses in his work, and to consider what is his individual, unique style, than this author differs from others.